About Me

My photo
I am an extrovert by nature and an introspect when necessary. I enjoy life and do not take it for granted. My passion is to help educators become more effective at what they do, not only through changing practices, but changing assumptions about the students they teach- particularly, students of color, Standard English Leaners, English Language learners and all others who have been systematically denied access to core curriculum and subjugated to low expectations.

10 July 2008

Levels of English Proficiency

As we discussed yesterday, there are 5 different recognized levels of English proficiency officially recognized and possible on the CELDT: Beginning, Early Intermediate, Intermediate, Early Advanced and Advanced.

Now, before explaining what we can expect from a student at each of these proficiency levels, remember, a student is given a proficiency level in EVERY domain, and they may be different. So for example, the student may be Early Intermediate in Reading but Early Advanced in Listening.

Also, as a shorthand, teachers tend to talk about their students' proficiency levels in terms of a number from 1 to 5, corresponding to 1- Beginning, 2-Early Intermediate, 3-Intermediate, 4-Early Advanced and 5-Advanced. But they usually are referring to their overall proficiency level, based on their overall CELDT score. Thus, teachers say, "I'm teaching the 1s and 2s, Ms. Fletcher is teaching the 3s..."

Okay, finally lets take a look. And to give credit where credit is due, these descriptions come straight from the horse's mouth- the California Department of Education. Enjoy the slides:

The 5 levels described...

Beginning
Students performing at this level of English language proficiency may demonstrate little or no receptive or productive English skills. They are beginning to understand a few concrete details during unmodified instruction. They may be able to respond to some communication and learning demands, but with many errors. Oral and written production is usually limited to disconnected words and memorized statements and questions. Frequent errors make communication difficult.

Early Intermediate
Students performing at this level of English language proficiency continue to develop receptive and productive English skills. They are able to identify and understand more concrete details during unmodified instruction. They may be able to respond with increasing ease to more varied communication and learning demands with a reduced number of errors. Oral and written production is usually limited to phrases and memorized statements and questions. Frequent errors still reduce communication.

Intermediate
Students performing at this level of English language proficiency begin to tailor the English language skills to meet communication and learning demands with increasing accuracy. They are able to identify and understand more concrete details and some major abstract concepts during unmodified instruction. They are able to respond with increasing ease to more varied communication and learning demands with a reduced number of errors. Oral and written production has usually expanded to sentences, paragraphs, and original statements and questions. Errors still complicate communication.

Early Advanced
Students performing at this level of English language proficiency begin to combine the elements of the English language in complex, cognitively demanding situations and are able to use English as a means for learning in content areas. They are able to identify and summarize most concrete details and abstract concepts during unmodified instruction in most content areas. Oral and written production is characterized by more elaborate discourse and fully-developed paragraphs and compositions. Errors are less frequent and rarely complicate communication.

Advanced
Students performing at this level of English language proficiency communicate effectively with various audiences on a wide range of familiar and new topics to meet social and learning demands. In order to attain the English proficiency level of their native English-speaking peers, further linguistic enhancement and refinement are still necessary. They are able to identify and summarize concrete details and abstract concepts during unmodified instruction in all content areas. Oral and written production reflects discourse appropriate for content areas. Errors are infrequent and do not reduce communication.

Until next time...

2 comments:

Mister Bean said...

Hmmm....I was given ELL classes when I arrived in CA this last school year (mind you, w/o the proper credential) and I found the ELL 'system' lacking- kids were classified incorrectly, corralled into the wrong classes and pretty mismatched interms of their schedules. I found it abhorrant- In Chicago, where what they do for ELL can be summed up as 'not much', I feel it ended up working in the kids best interests- they learned English because they HAD to. I guess I'm playing devil's advocate here, but you are kind of toeing the party line, n'est pas?

Weezy said...

Pas vraiment. Not really.

Actually, I believe in what most research says regarding how ELLs learn best. I'd like to get into that in this space-or you can always feel free to ask specific things and I'll be happy to oblige and post.

Also, please remember, ONE thing is knowing what research says and how theoretically to put into practice.

It is QUITE ANOTHER to implement it in a way that is pedagogically, developmentally and socio-linguistically sound within a political environment that is rather anti-immigrant, pro "English-only" (Prop 227 in CA- now law, see other states for similar debacles)and very testing oriented and alarmist under NCLB. I'm sorry about your CA experience- it is unfortunately, not uncommon.

So, there are a few districts that want to do things right. I'm not sure about Chicago- but we are not advocates of submersion either. Learning English because "you have to" sounds to me like submersion. We advocate ELD for every student in EVERY language program- mainstream and bilingual alternative.
After all, NO STUDENT, save a tiny percentage, speak/learn/interact with Academic English at home. Certainly not the vast majority of our ELLs.

Mister Bean, thanks for taking the time to notice (And read!) my very lonely little blog.

Please check back soon!

Weezy

Keep me Informed!

Search